Peter Melman

 

AN ISTHMUS JOINS TWO DISTINCT CONSEQUENCES

 

 

To be a man of consequence,

she said, means knowing who to call

when your back’s up against it, don’t you see?

So I said, what time’s it now?

6:14, she said, and 26…27…28 seconds,

and meant it. I wondered—who?

Lassie, my cousin-the-Cop, the Good

Humor Man who’s been skipping

the block lately, for lands where

children are fatter, faster, flusher?

So, who? I looked to phone,

understanding, if I wanted any dessert

I’d have to make the icebox myself.

Goddamned cold it was too, goddamned

cold, only to find she’d eaten the

chocolate, all of it brown, the strawberry,

fruit-chunkless, leaving an isthmus

of vanilla, like paste, sides scraped,

soiled with negative space.

An isthmus, some cool grafting

of two, like ice to ice.

You, I said, who the

fuck else?

 

 

from The Feast of Empty Air, Chapter One

 

"But in his sleep he dreamed of food, his jaws / Closing on nothing, and he ground his teeth / On nothing, and his throat kept swallowing nothing, / His feast was empty air, and when he wakened, / He was ravenous."

—Ovid's Metamorphoses,

Book VIII, "The Story of Erysichthon"

 

 

A tip on launching an Italian in Manhattan: success means a waitstaff from Rome, period. Forget expenses. Pluck them right off the boat, bribe Immigration with Knicks tickets and Johnnie Walker, promise new Vespas if necessary, do whatever it takes, but go Roman. Get them young and perfumed, the kind who'll wear clothing more refined than the restaurant's patrons ever will. Consider this. Two thousand years ago their ancestors were serving the Bacchanal, negotiating projectile vomit and grapes on hard marble. They were stewards to nobles who loved to grab hold of a scrotum while being poured wine, threatening castration if a drop spilled, so it shouldn't present a problem when some neurotic from Scarsdale asks for vinaigrette on the side. These guys are priceless. They scarcely conceal their disdain for those they serve, and nobody, not even Wall Street ballbreakers, has the moxie to do anything about it.

But it's in the kitchen, that's where they're worth their new scooters. I worked with them once, for about five days. Too green for the front of the house, Sebastian stuck me in the back doing salads. I've never heard such indignation, and I've shared walls with neighbors who were blind. Table Seven swills good Barolo—Antonio screams for a cleaver. Table Eleven crams buffalo mozzarella and prosciutto crudo into a roll, then asks for mayo—Leo tosses his apron to the floor. In the kitchen they were coarse, shouting bastards, the cacophony of ten voices at once like the hagglers and hawkers of an open-air market, their native Italy reclaiming its stake in them. That's why you need to go old country. Because these guys are better at their jobs than most patrons are at their own, and any patron worth a damn will leave realizing this.

 

Four years have passed since I worked that kitchen, but whenever I'm down on Mulberry I sometimes step in for an espresso and a series of small, Mediterranean bows. The bows, I realize, aren't due to any occupational solidarity the Italians and I may have once shared, nor do they suggest the least trace of kindness. No, I'd be an asshole to think they bow for any other reason than they have to. Despite Sebastian's warm, meaty hugs and double-cheeked kisses, I know mine is the one job that makes their backs stiffen, their mouths draw tight. While I'm sitting by the large, plate-glass window, stirring my espresso, I am aware the noisy kitchen has gone silent at my expense. Outside, the sun may be setting on Manhattan, the East Side may be met by the deepening shadows of the West, and I might be drinking my espresso slowly, two fingers and a thumb, thinking of Kate or admiring decorative wheels of Romano cheese the size of dummy spares—and I'll be struck by the quiet of the moment. Once my espresso is done, I'll sit back, nose in the air, and search for the smells of fresh oregano sauces and apples and dusty semolina, kitchen smells that cause hungry little children to stamp their feet. And when I stand to pay, clapping Sebastian once on his fat arm before I go, he'll smile at me and say "Ciao, Reuben," not because I prepared his salads for five days, four years ago, but because I now have the power to destroy him.

 

Questo Momento is one of the few places where I'm always recognized, so I like to get there once every couple of months if possible. On those rare occasions when I am known beyond Mulberry St., restaurants are left no choice but to seat me, when I want and usually where. It's in these moments I swear I'm in love with myself, though if I had a psychiatrist I'd probably pay him to tell me I shouldn't admit it. The ethics of my profession are near Buddhist in their demand for understatement, most food critics going to great lengths to preserve their anonymity. Then again, most of my colleagues have me by twenty years. Now in their fifties and sixties, they've grown tired of the flattery, of the sweet talk fawning, and get their kicks instead from soft-core role-play. Word is a few have colluded to enroll in Costume Design 101 for a semester at the Tisch School, down at N.Y.U. I’ve heard The Village Voice enjoys wearing worn overalls and broken teeth to five-stars: "'Scuse me, son, y'all go head and char my steak but good. No use in puttin' meat to flame, 'less you aim to burn it some." Or New York's hooker from the Bowery, fishnet-stockinged: "Bowl of anything, just so long as it ain’t cream-based." I know for a fact The New York Times owns eleven wigs; my favorite, a gray pageboy, gives her a look of seasoned acerbity I find sexy. The Observer dines under as many as eight different credit card aliases. Most of the critics I know take pride in their ability to sample a place incognito, perhaps because there's a growing number of kitchens that red-flag our names and reservation phone numbers. A few of the more investigative owners are posting our photographs in the back, which, if true, dumps us somewhere in the range of post-office felon, and that kills me. I can't help but wonder if I've made it up there, anywhere, and if so, whether they've managed a shot of my good side.

Overall, my job is about the push and pull of fast-ones, what with the wigs and second-hand glasses and affected accents; all this for the off-chance that we'll be served as poorly as the next guy, or that the meal itself will be so inedibly bad that our consciences will be clear when we fill our articles with euphemized words for "shit." Hidden beneath the false fronts, critics feel they're more likely to unearth honest intentions, something the very nature of our profession jeopardizes. "Fair," they say, "fair is a must," and to a certain extent I agree. I've got a hardened rule that I never go to press on a place without eating there at least three times. Objectivity is a good thing, but on Saturday night in a crowded restaurant in Manhattan, principles won't get you to a better table. In Manhattan, principles get you the bathroom flyway.

Restaurants work plenty of their own angles, don’t you worry. I've heard it said that there's nothing a restaurant can do to enhance a visit, that each customer gets the same experience, famous or not, but that's crap. When you've got celebrity, you get attended, you get their main man, your dishes get preferential treatment, the head chef himself may work your meal. Big shots invest millions in these places, and because the 1st Amendment protects your power to pull their plug, you can be damned sure that if they know you, they'll do their best to get you off in the only way they can—with way, way too many truffles.

Still, I mostly call in for reservations, like everyone else. I wait to be seated, like everyone else. Like everybody else, I'm forgotten by the waitstaff three minutes after my credit card clears. My cholesterol level has broken 200, I'm gaining weight on a short frame, and I've always had a strange relationship with food. I study cookbooks the way most freshmen do Shakespeare, as if assigned, though not without some measure of admiration. I subscribe to Saveur, Culinary Trends, Williams-Sonoma Taste, Bon Appétit, Quarterly Review of Wines, and Wine Spectator because when a new dish or vintage or saucepan alloy is introduced, my occupation demands I know it. I keep Toussaint-Samat's History of Food by my toilet, and a few years ago I attended three sessions of a cooking course because the instructor was a woman I'd met at a cooking expo, and thought delicious. My editor feels I'm pretty good, even if she rails against my habitual inability to make word count: “Goddamnit, Reuben, I’ve only got so much column.” And lately she’s taken to labeling my writing style as “self-conscious, too artsy for its own good,” that my details “tax the reader’s patience with their over-the-topness.” “Fine,” I think to myself, “you want concision, how’s this for concision—‘blow me.’” I smile. Jesus Christ, this isn’t Manhattan, Kansas I’m writing about here; this is NYC, the big-top. Of course my style’s going to be self-conscious and artsy, you silly little dyke.

She does confess that I know food, though feels I’m unable as yet to truly inhabit a meal. I gnash my teeth and tell her it's a meal's job to inhabit me. Despite our friction and the seemingly rote attention I'm forced to pay it, I do love eating. The flavors, the ambience, the artistry—all of it. The problem is, dining out has begun to get stale, as has my job, as do all jobs, eventually. Whereas I once relished the idea of a good meal, I'm now forced to admit the appeal of television, turkey on rye, and a can of Dr. Brown’s for dinner. So if it's the recognition I like, sue me. It's a small victory, I know, but in this city of millions, you take your Waterloos.

Like tonight for instance. I'm supposed to head back to this place, The Great Helmsman. Upscale Chinese, it opened at 57th and 1st six weeks ago, geared toward the intolerant of MSG. The owner Chu'an is a good man, with a son in the Pioneers back in Beijing and a pathological need to debase Kissinger. Even though his past few attempts at haute Chinese have failed miserably, I can’t help but admire him. As generous with the maotai as any mainland Communist I've ever met. Assuming he doesn't botch my name too badly, an abridged version of the write-up should go something like this:

Well, it seems Mr. Chu'an has done it again. Amongst the alter Menschen of Sutton Place, he's staked his claim as one of the Red Guard's finest epicures, an expat inexplicably stationed north of Canal St., though very happy indeed to be there, as his kosher ice creams attempt to suggest. For starters, try the kau choi kau, or fried chive dumplings, and, providing the rabbi is sitting shiva at anyone's table but your own, try the pork lo mein as a side. For a rare treat, order squab. Don't worry, Mr. Chu'an swears his pigeons come from an accredited supplier in Flushing, so if you spot him in the Park with a burlap sack and bread crumbs, just remember the old adage about how tough it is to tell his kind apart. Hint: Keep talk of human rights abuse chained to the curb outside; you'll get better service that way. Casual attire. Reservations recommended. All major cc accepted.

It may not be particularly genteel, but it works in Manhattan. New Yorkers love ringside seats to someone else's injury because as a consensus, they're the only people I know who actually believe their mothers didn't raise them well enough. It's the living with too many hard edges. The street, the geometry where building meets sky, the smell of sauerkraut. All hard and sharp. A review like this lets them know they're not alone in believing they've discovered the awful truth of things. Now understand, I like New York. People here smile as well as anywhere in the world. It's just that, like failure, laughter here is a little more painful to admit.

I acknowledge my reviews aren't necessarily inspired, but inspiration either alienates or earns you a Pulitzer, and I'm still waiting on my call from Columbia. With thousands of restaurants on the island of Manhattan, you can be twenty-nine and a food critic and no one will consider you a waste. Not your friends or past professors, not your father, not in New York, because the amount of respect you get for criticizing the work of others is perfectly appropriate to this city, a city admired most for its culture inherited from older, bluer cities. It's an impressive power, considering the number of lives at stake.

 

 

Go to Anthology Contents

Go to Pete Melman’s Page

Go to Creative Writing Home Page

Go to English Department Home Page

 

 

© 2001, University of Louisiana at Lafayette.
This site designed and maintained by The Creative Writing Concentration of the English Department of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.
To contact us by mail: Director of Creative Writing, English Department, Box 44691, UL-Lafayette, Lafayette LA 70504-4691; by telephone, 337-482-5478;
by email, jlm8047@louisiana.edu.
Last updated: May 1, 2001.